An Evaluation of Macro-Fundamental Variables and Political Risk on the Fluctuations of Returns of the Tehran Stock Exchange

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Financial Management, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Financial Management, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran.

Abstract

The liability of capital markets towards fluctuations, combined with investor and policy-makers’ need to identify risk factors has motivated empirical and theoretical researchers to devote a significant portion of the literature on capital markets to the study of the abovementioned issue. This article examines the underlying factors affecting fluctuations in Iran's capital markets, particularly focusing on macro-fundamental variables and political risk factors. For this purpose, the study focused on the March 2018 to September 2022 time period. The variables considered in this study included; the fluctuations of the Tehran Exchange Dividend Price Index (TEDPIX) as the dependent variable, and independent variables included gross domestic product, liquidity, inflation, interest rate, nominal exchange rate and the political risk index extracted from the International Country Risk Guide (ICRG). The methodology used for this purpose relied on autoregressive distributed lags, and to obtain fluctuations, the study utilized the model of generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity.
The results obtained indicated that in the long run, the ICRG country risk variable (a higher index number indicates a lower associated risk), and the nominal exchange rate have a negative relationship with the fluctuations of the Iranian capital market. The effect of other variables used in the model on the fluctuations of Tehran Stock Exchange was found to be positive. The results showed the lack of coordination of long-term and short-term effects, constituting an exigency that requires attention from policymakers and investors when making decisions.

Keywords


اصغرپور، حسین؛ بهبودی، داوود و محمدحسین قزوینیان. (1387). شکست ساختاری: مورد مصرف گاز طبیعی و رشد اقتصادی در ایران، فصلنامه مطالعات اقتصاد انرژی، 5(19) 122-105.
عسگرنژاد نوری، باقر. (1397). عوامل مؤثر در بازده سهام شرکتهای پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران: رویکرد فراتحلیل، مدیریت دارایی و تأمین مالی، 6(1)،29-50.
فاتحی، سامان. (1395). بررسی تاثیر کیفیت گزارشگری مالی بر نوسانات بازده غیرمتعارف سهام شرکت های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران، فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت و حسابداری، 2(2)، 111-119.
مجتهدی، فاطمه؛ مجاوریان، سیدمجتبی و حسینی یکانی، سیدعلی. (1399). تعیین پرتفوی بهینه با مدل سازی ریسک سیستماتیک: شرکت های صنایع غذایی منتخب بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی (علوم و صنایع کشاورزی)، 34(2)، 149-161.
مشکی، مهدی و عاصی ربانی، محمود. (1390). بررسی رابطه بین خطای پیش بینی سود مدیریت با بازده غیرعادی سهام و ریسک سیستماتیک در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. بررسی های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 18(66)ف 53-68.
مهرآرا، محسن، حیدری ظهیری و نازی، فلاحتی، ذبیح‌اله. (1392). بررسی رابطه بین ریسک سیستماتیک و بازده سهام در بازار بورس اوراق بهادار تهران (از سال 1387 تا 1392) با استفاده از مدل قیمت‌گذاری دارایی سرمایه‌ای، تحلیل های اقتصادی توسعه ایران، 1(1)، 67-91.
نمکی، علی؛ عباسیان، عزت اله و شفیعی، الهه. (1401). تجزیه و تحلیل میزان ریسک سیستمی شرکت های بورس اوراق بهادار تهران با استفاده از رویکرد سیستم های پیچیده، راهبرد مدیریت مالی، 10(36)، 91-112.
نوفرستی، محمد. ‌(1378). ریشه واحد و همجمعی در اقتصادسنجی. تهران: موسسه خدمات فرهنگی رسا.
 
Amtiran, P. Y., & Indiastuti, R. (2017). Political Risk and Stock Returns in Indonesia. Journal of Finance and Banking Review2(3), 8-13.
Ben Nasr, A., Cunado, J., Demirer, R., & Gupta, R. (2018). Country risk ratings and stock market returns in Brazil, Russia, India, and China (BRICS) countries: a nonlinear dynamic approach. Risks6(3), 94.
Bose, D. (2014, July). Real exchange rates and international competitiveness–concepts, measures and trends in new zealand. In paper for the NZAE Conference (pp. 76-78).
Bhuiyan, E. M., & Chowdhury, M. (2020). Macroeconomic variables and stock market indices: Asymmetric dynamics in the US and Canada. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 77, 62-74.
Chen, N. F., Roll, R., & Ross, S. A. (1986). Economic forces and the stock market. Journal of business, 383-403.
Das, K. K., & Yaghoubi, M. (2023). Stock liquidity and firm-level political risk. Finance Research Letters51, 103419.
Dhakal, D., Kandil, M. and Sharma, S.C., 1993. Causality between the money supply and share prices: a VAR investigation. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 32 (3), 52-74
De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H., & Waldmann, R. J. (1990). Noise trader risk in financial markets. Journal of political Economy, 98(4), 703-738.
Fisher, K. L., & Statman, M. (2000). Investor sentiment and stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(2), 16-23.
Francis, J., Soffer, L. 1997. The relative informativeness of analysts’ stock recommendations and earnings forecast revisions. Journal of Accounting Research 35, 193-211.
Friedman, M. (1953). The case of flexible exchange rates essays in positive economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gala, V. D., Pagliardi, G., & Zenios, S. A. (2023). Global political risk and international stock returns. Journal of Empirical Finance, 72(2), 78-102.
Hillier, D., & Loncan, T. (2019). Political uncertainty and stock returns: Evidence from the Brazilian political crisis. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 54, 1-12.
Liu, P., Peng, Y., Shi, Y., & Yang, J. (2022). Financial structures, political risk and economic growth. The European Journal of Finance28(4-5), 356-376.
Markowitz, H. (1952). The utility of wealth. Journal of political Economy, 60(2), 151-158.
Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 347-370.
Pástor, Ľ., & Pietro, V. (2003). Stock valuation and learning about profitability. The Journal of Finance, 58(5), 1749-1789.
Shleifer, A., & Summers, L. H. (1990). The noise trader approach to finance. Journal of Economic perspectives, 4(2), 19-33.
Statman, M. (2014). Behavioral finance: Finance with normal people. Borsa Istanbul Review, 14(2), 65-73.
Tuyon, J., Ahmad, Z. 2016. Behavioural finance perspectives on Malaysian stock market efficiency. Borsa Istanbul Review, 16(1), 43-61.
Thampanya, N., Wu, J., Nasir, M. A., & Liu, J. (2020). Fundamental and behavioural determinants of stock return volatility in ASEAN-5 countries. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 65, 101193.
Ukpong, I., Tan, H., & Yarovaya, L. (2021). Determinants of industry herding in the US stock market. Finance Research Letters43, 101953.
Wei, S. X., & Zhang, C. (2006). Why did individual stocks become more volatile?. The Journal of Business, 79(1), 259-292.
West, T., & Worthington, A. C. (2006). Macroeconomic risk factors in Australian commercial real estate, listed property trust and property sector stock returns. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 11(2), 105-116.
Wongbangpo, P., & Sharma, S. C. (2002). Stock market and macroeconomic fundamental dynamic interactions: ASEAN-5 countries. Journal of asian Economics, 13(1), 27-51.
Yadav, A., & Hegde, P. S. (2021). Arbitrage Pricing Theory and its relevance in modelling market. Management Dynamics21(2), 18-26.
Zorgui, I. (2011). Institutional quality and political risk. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 3 (1).