Towards a New Economic Diplomacy Strategy; Turning from West Asian Geopolitics of Fear towards the Asian Geo-economics of Mutual Prosperity

Mousavi Shafaee, Seyyed Masoud; Shahveisi, Sasan

Towards a New Economic Diplomacy Strategy; Turning from West Asian Geopolitics of Fear towards the Asian Geo-economics of Mutual Prosperity

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

¹ Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

² Assistant Professor, Economics Research Institute, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

In contrast with the Cold War era, where the world order was maintained through a bipolar dispersion of hegemonic power, in the current international climate we are faced with the dispersion of power in a multipolar world order - with some even going so far as talking about the emersion of a non-polar world order. The decreasing willingness and ability of ‘the great powers’ to engage directly in regional matters _ as evident by their reversion towards playing a more minor role through indirectly shaping the regional balances power _ has meant that the result of the current dispersion of power has been the fluidization of the international order. Hence, new spaces have opened for emerging regional powers to exercise action and become more active in trying to increase their sphere of influence in various regions of the world. Amidst these conditions, the geo-economical approach of East Asia based on cooperation and mutual prosperity which has unleashed previously hidden opportunities, has brought relative order and stability to that region. On the other hand, we observe the prevailing dominance of geopolitics of terror, instability, war, and conflict in West Asia. The international position and geographical location of Iran has located this country in the middle of these two regions, with opposing approaches to geopolitics; One is Asia in its general sense, which seems to be more inclined towards developing a flourishing geo-economy, and the other is West Asia, which is caught in the geopolitical trap of fear. In light of the foregoing, the modus operandi of this paper started by collecting data through document examination and analyzed them using a descriptive-analytical method.
The results of this study indicate that in the current climate, turning away from the West Asian geopolitics of fear towards (East) Asian prosperity should be the main objective of the country in terms economic diplomacy. Furthermore, the paper argues that this objective should be pursued through a framework of mutual benefits with neighboring countries.

Highlights

افشردی، محمد حسین و سید مصطفی مدنی (1388). ساختار نظام قدرت منطقهای در غرب آسیا (با تاکید بر کشورهای برتر منطقه)، فصلنامه مدرس علوم انسانی، 13(3)، 113-141.

امیدبخش اسفندیار (١٣٨٤). چالش‌های دیپلماسی اقتصادی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، پنجاه و هشتمین نشست تخصصی معاونت پژوهش‌های سیاست خارجی، مرکز تحقیقات استراتژیک، مجمع تشخیص مصلحت نظام.

شیخ عطار علیرضا (1385) ، همراهی دیپلماسی و اقتصاد، همشهری دیپلماتیک.

Amsden, A. H. (1994). Why isn't the whole world experimenting with the East Asian model to develop?: Review of the East Asian miracle. World Development, 22(4), 627-633.

Berridge, G.R., & Alan, J. (2001), A Dictionary of Diplomacy, Palgrave, U.K.

Friedman, T. L. (2000). The Lexus and the olive tree: Understanding globalization. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Gore-Booth Lord (ed) (1979). Satow's Guide to Diplomatic Practice, Longman.

Heywood, Andrew. (2011). Global Politics, Palgrave Macmillan.

Luttwak, E. N. (1990). From geopolitics to geo-economics: Logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. The national interest, (20), 17-23.

Mousavi Shafaee, Masoud,, & Golmohammadi Vali and. (2022), The regional-supremacy trap: disorder in the middle east, Middle East Policy, 29(1), 61-73

Mousavi, Shafaee., Masoud & Naghdi, Farzaneh. (2016). Regional powers and world order in the post cold war era, Geopolitics Quarterly, 11(4), 148-176.

Mattlin, Mikael., & Mikael, Wigell. (2016), Geoeconomics in the context of restive regional powers, Asia Eur Journal, 14(3), 122-145.

Scholte, Jan Art. (2000). Globalization, governance and corporate citizenship, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 8(4), 383-402.

Scholvin, Soren. (2010). Emerging non-OECD countries: global shifts in power and geopolitical regionalization, German Institute of Global and Area Studies.

Sparke, Matthew. (2007). Geopolitical fears, geoeconomic hopes and the responsibility of geography, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97 (2), 323-345.

Sweijs & et.al (2014). Why are pivot States are so pivotal? the role of pivot States in regional and global security, The Hague Center for Strategic Studies (HCSS).

Taylor, Peter J. (2004). World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis, London: Rutledge.

UNCTAD (1998). World Investment Report: Trends & Determinants, Geneva.

UNCTAD (2000). World Investment Report: Trends & Determinants, Geneva.

Wigell, Mikael. (2016). Conceptualizing regional powers’ geoeconomic strategies: neo-imperialism, neo-mercantilism, hegemony and liberal institutionalism, Asia Eur Journal, 14(2) .135- 151.

Keywords

20.1001.1.25382454.1401.7.26.4.4

References